Kamens v. Utica Mutual Insurance

6 A.D.3d 1245, 775 N.Y.S.2d 735
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kamens v. Utica Mutual Insurance. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 A.D.3d 1237
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 30, 2004·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered January 3, 2003. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted plaintiffs summary judgment dismissing the affirmative defenses and counterclaim of intervenor-defendant.

It is hereby ordered that the order insofar as appealed from be and the same hereby is reversed on the law without costs, the fifth ordering paragraph is vacated, and the complaint against intervenor-defendant is dismissed.

Same memorandum as in Kamens v Utica Mut. Ins. Co. (6 AD3d 1237 [2004]).

All concur except Pigott, Jr., P.J. and Hayes, J., who dissent and vote to affirm in the same dissenting memorandum as in Kamens v Utica Mut. Ins. Co. (6 AD3d 1237, 1243 [2004]). Present—Pigott, Jr., EJ., Wisner, Kehoe, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kamens v. Utica Mutual Insurance, 6 A.D.3d 1245, 775 N.Y.S.2d 735 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

6 A.D.3d 1245 (Kamens v. Utica Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamens v. Utica Mutual Insurance
6 A.D.3d 1237 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)