Kamens v. Utica Mutual Insurance

3 N.Y.3d 653
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kamens v. Utica Mutual Insurance. Read the opinion of the Court — 4 N.Y.3d 460
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 1, 2004·No. Appeal No. 1; Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

[654]*654On the Court’s own motion, cross appeals by Violetta Dickinson, in her individual and representative capacities, dismissed, each without costs, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissents at the Appellate Division are not in favor of the cross appellants {see CPLR 5601 [a]). Utica Mutual Insurance Company’s motion for a stay granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kamens v. Utica Mutual Insurance, 3 N.Y.3d 653 (N.Y. 2004).

3 N.Y.3d 653 (Kamens v. Utica Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.