Kamen v. Weithorn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kamen v. Weithorn

83 A.D.3d 560, 920 N.Y.S.2d 668

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 21, 2011·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira S. Gammerman, J.H.O.), entered March 18, 2010, which, upon defendant’s default, granted [561] plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, unanimously dismissed, with costs, as taken from a nonappealable judgment.

Since the judgment appealed from was granted on default, no appeal lies therefrom. Defendant’s remedy is an application to the rendering court to vacate the judgment, if not otherwise time barred (see CPLR 5511, 5015; Armin A. Meizlik Co. Inc. v L&K Jewelry Inc., 68 AD3d 530 [2009]). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira S. Gammerman, J.H.O.), entered March 18, 2010, which, upon defendant’s default, granted [561] plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, unanimously dismissed, with costs, as taken from a nonappealable judgment.

Since the judgment appealed from was granted on default, no appeal lies therefrom. Defendant’s remedy is an application to the rendering court to vacate the judgment, if not otherwise time barred (see CPLR 5511, 5015; Armin A. Meizlik Co. Inc. v L&K Jewelry Inc., 68 AD3d 530 [2009]). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.

Kamen v. Weithorn, 83 A.D.3d 560, 920 N.Y.S.2d 668 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

83 A.D.3d 560 (Kamen v. Weithorn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related