Kamco Supply Corp. v. Nevada Construction

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kamco Supply Corp. v. Nevada Construction

8 A.D.3d 196, 778 N.Y.S.2d 688, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8844

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.3d 196 (Kamco Supply Corp. v. Nevada Construction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kamco Supply Corp. v. Nevada Construction, 8 A.D.3d 196, 778 N.Y.S.2d 688, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from order and judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered April 7, 2003 and June 17, 2003, respectively, which, upon defendants-appellants’ default in appearing, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the fourteenth cause of action and entitled it to recover from defendants-appellants the total amount of $372,630.71, unanimously dismissed, with one bill of costs in favor of plaintiff, payable by defendants-appellants.

No appeal lies from either the order or the judgment appealed from, both papers having been entered in consequence of defendants-appellants’ default in appearing (see CPLR 5511; Ross Bicycles, Inc. v Citibank, N.A., 134 AD2d 181 [1987]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Lerner and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from order and judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered April 7, 2003 and June 17, 2003, respectively, which, upon defendants-appellants’ default in appearing, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the fourteenth cause of action and entitled it to recover from defendants-appellants the total amount of $372,630.71, unanimously dismissed, with one bill of costs in favor of plaintiff, payable by defendants-appellants.

No appeal lies from either the order or the judgment appealed from, both papers having been entered in consequence of defendants-appellants’ default in appearing (see CPLR 5511; Ross Bicycles, Inc. v Citibank, N.A., 134 AD2d 181 [1987]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Lerner and Catterson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.3d 196, 778 N.Y.S.2d 688, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kamco-supply-corp-v-nevada-construction-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack