Kamber v. Rosen

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Kamber v. Rosen

98 N.Y.S. 839

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 1906

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 98 N.Y.S. 839 (Kamber v. Rosen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kamber v. Rosen, 98 N.Y.S. 839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We do not think that the guaranty ever became effective, because it was never accepted by plaintiff. The original guaranty was returned for the addition of a clause. Up to this time if certainly had not been accepted, and the guarantors had a right to recall it. This they unmistakably did. We do not consider that the minds of the parties ever met on the subject. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We do not think that the guaranty ever became effective, because it was never accepted by plaintiff. The original guaranty was returned for the addition of a clause. Up to this time if certainly had not been accepted, and the guarantors had a right to recall it. This they unmistakably did. We do not consider that the minds of the parties ever met on the subject. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 N.Y.S. 839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kamber-v-rosen-nyappterm-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack