Kamasinski v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kamasinski v. State

953 So. 2d 19, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3007, 2007 WL 620102

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 2, 2007·No. No. 5D06-2540·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review an appeal by the appellant, Dennis William Kamasinski, of the denial by the trial court of his motion for new trial addressed to his conviction by a jury of premeditated first degree murder in 1985. We affirm. First, Mr. Kamasin-ski’s motion was filed well beyond the ten-day limitation contained in rule 3.590(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Second, his motion was successive, and was properly denied on that ground, as well.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for review an appeal by the appellant, Dennis William Kamasinski, of the denial by the trial court of his motion for new trial addressed to his conviction by a jury of premeditated first degree murder in 1985. We affirm. First, Mr. Kamasin-ski’s motion was filed well beyond the ten-day limitation contained in rule 3.590(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Second, his motion was successive, and was properly denied on that ground, as well.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Kamasinski v. State, 953 So. 2d 19, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3007, 2007 WL 620102 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

953 So. 2d 19 (Kamasinski v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.