Kamalian v. Community OB/GYN Associates, PLLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kamalian v. Community OB/GYN Associates, PLLC

132 A.D.3d 814, 17 N.Y.S.3d 879

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 2015

Docket2014-01912

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 132 A.D.3d 814 (Kamalian v. Community OB/GYN Associates, PLLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kamalian v. Community OB/GYN Associates, PLLC, 132 A.D.3d 814, 17 N.Y.S.3d 879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter

alia, to recover damages for breach of a lease, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Marx, J.), entered November 19, 2013, as, upon a decision of the same court dated August 19, 2013, made after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the defendants and against him dismissing the first cause of action, and in favor of the defendant Community OB/GYN Associates, PLLC, and against him on its counterclaim in the principal sum of $1,188.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“In reviewing a determination made after a nonjury trial, the power of this Court is as broad as that of the trial court, and we may render a judgment we find warranted by the facts, bearing in mind that in a close case, the trial court had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses” (Zutrau v ICE Sys., Inc., 128 AD3d 1058, 1060 [2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]). Where the court’s findings of fact “rest in large measure on considerations relating to the credibility of witnesses, deference is owed to the trial court’s credibility determinations” (Neiss v Fried, 127 AD3d 1044, 1046 [2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Gomez v Eleni, LLC, 122 AD3d 797, 798 [2014]). Here, the Supreme Court’s determination that the plaintiff did not accept the modified lease or deliver an executed copy of the modified lease to the defendants, rendering the modified lease ineffective (see 219 Broadway Corp. v Alexander’s, Inc., 46 NY2d 506, 511-512 [1979]), was warranted by the facts. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the first cause of action, which sought to recover damages for breach of the lease.

The plaintiffs remaining contention is without merit. Rivera,

J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter

alia, to recover damages for breach of a lease, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Marx, J.), entered November 19, 2013, as, upon a decision of the same court dated August 19, 2013, made after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the defendants and against him dismissing the first cause of action, and in favor of the defendant Community OB/GYN Associates, PLLC, and against him on its counterclaim in the principal sum of $1,188.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“In reviewing a determination made after a nonjury trial, the power of this Court is as broad as that of the trial court, and we may render a judgment we find warranted by the facts, bearing in mind that in a close case, the trial court had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses” (Zutrau v ICE Sys., Inc., 128 AD3d 1058, 1060 [2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]). Where the court’s findings of fact “rest in large measure on considerations relating to the credibility of witnesses, deference is owed to the trial court’s credibility determinations” (Neiss v Fried, 127 AD3d 1044, 1046 [2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Gomez v Eleni, LLC, 122 AD3d 797, 798 [2014]). Here, the Supreme Court’s determination that the plaintiff did not accept the modified lease or deliver an executed copy of the modified lease to the defendants, rendering the modified lease ineffective (see 219 Broadway Corp. v Alexander’s, Inc., 46 NY2d 506, 511-512 [1979]), was warranted by the facts. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the first cause of action, which sought to recover damages for breach of the lease.

The plaintiffs remaining contention is without merit. Rivera,

J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 A.D.3d 814, 17 N.Y.S.3d 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kamalian-v-community-obgyn-associates-pllc-nyappdiv-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack