Kamal Williams v. State of Florida
This text of Kamal Williams v. State of Florida (Kamal Williams v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 20, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-1286 Lower Tribunal No. F08-26940A ________________
Kamal Williams, Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Altfield, Judge.
Kamal Williams, in proper person.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, C.J., and GORDO, and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Breedlove v. Singletary, 595 So. 2d 8, 10 (Fla. 1992)
(“Habeas corpus is not a second appeal and cannot be used to litigate or
relitigate issues which could have been, should have been, or were raised
on direct appeal.”); White v. Dugger, 511 So. 2d 554, 555 (Fla. 1987)
(“[H]abeas corpus is not a vehicle for obtaining additional appeals of issues
which were raised, or should have been raised, on direct appeal or which
were waived at trial or which could have, should have, or have been, raised
in rule 3.850 proceedings.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kamal Williams v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kamal-williams-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.