Kamagate v. Reno
This text of 22 F. App'x 73 (Kamagate v. Reno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and was submitted by petitioner pro se and by counsel for respondents.
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Amon’s Memorandum and Order dated January 29, 2001. Our affirmance is without prejudice to a motion by petitioner in the district court for release pending resolution of his challenge to the order of removal.
We have considered all of petitioner’s contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 F. App'x 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kamagate-v-reno-ca2-2001.