Kam v. Blank

23 Misc. 2d 951, 199 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3370
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 22, 1960·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court erred in determining as a matter of law that the general release delivered to John I. Phlegar, Jr., discharged the defendant, a cotort-feasor. The general release effected a settlement of the action in New Jersey. Under the circumstances, the law of New Jersey should have been applied in a determination of the effect of the general release upon the liability of a cotort-feasor. The burden of proof is upon the defendant to sustain his contention that a general release under the law of New Jersey releases a cotort-feasor.

The judgment and order should be unanimously reversed, with costs to plaintiff to abide the event and motion for a new trial granted.

Concur — Di Giovanna, Benjamin and Daly, JJ.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kam v. Blank, 23 Misc. 2d 951, 199 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3370 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

23 Misc. 2d 951 (Kam v. Blank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garlock v. New York Tree Savers, Inc.
199 F. Supp. 59 (W.D. New York, 1961)