Kalu v. Holder
This text of Kalu v. Holder (Kalu v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2328
AKWARI KALU,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: July 14, 2009 Decided: July 28, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Senior Litigation Counsel, Michael C. Heyse, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Akwari Kalu, a native and citizen of Nigeria,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider. We have
reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of
discretion in the denial of relief on Kalu’s motion. See 8
C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2009). We accordingly deny the petition for
review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Kalu
(B.I.A. Oct. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kalu v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kalu-v-holder-ca4-2009.