Kaltner v. Kaltner

197 N.E. 287, 268 N.Y. 293, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 938
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 11, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record discloses that the plaintiff established her cause of action beyond any question and the action of the trial judge in refusing to grant judgment in favor of the plaintiff and in refusing to make findings of fact upon questions conclusively established constitutes reversible error.

*294 The judgment of the Appellate Division and that of the Special Term should be reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, and an interlocutory judgment of divorce directed in favor of the plaintiff awarding her custody of the children and twenty-five dollars per week alimony for the support of herself and children.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran and Finch, J J., concur; Grouch, J., taking no part.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaltner v. Kaltner, 197 N.E. 287, 268 N.Y. 293, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 938 (N.Y. 1935).

197 N.E. 287 (Kaltner v. Kaltner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sherman v. Sherman
267 A.D. 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)