Kaltenborn v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Third Circuit

Kaltenborn v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

392 F.2d 588

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 19, 1968

DocketNos. 16991, 16992

StatusPublished

This text of 392 F.2d 588 (Kaltenborn v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaltenborn v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 392 F.2d 588 (3d Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Before KALODNER, GANEY and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the defendant pursuant [589]*589to the jury’s verdict in a personal injury case, the District Court having refused to grant the petition for a new trial.

On review of the record we find no reversible prejudicial error.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Before KALODNER, GANEY and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the defendant pursuant [589]*589to the jury’s verdict in a personal injury case, the District Court having refused to grant the petition for a new trial.

On review of the record we find no reversible prejudicial error.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

392 F.2d 588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaltenborn-v-sears-roebuck-co-ca3-1968.