Kalra v. New York Life Insurance
This text of 244 A.D.2d 389 (Kalra v. New York Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful discharge, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated August 20, 1996, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, denied, as moot, the plaintiffs motions to compel discovery, and dismissed the complaint.
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment since the plaintiff failed to present proof of any material questions of fact which would preclude such relief (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). Moreover, the plaintiff has failed to demonstrate how further discovery might reveal the existence of material facts, currently within the exclusive knowledge and control of the defendants, which would warrant the denial of summary judgment (see, CPLR 3212 [fl; Delaney v Good Samaritan Hosp., 204 AD2d 678). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 A.D.2d 389, 665 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kalra-v-new-york-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1997.