Kalodner v. Stone

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Kalodner v. Stone

289 A.2d 454, 447 Pa. 594, 1972 Pa. LEXIS 591

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 20, 1972

DocketAppeals, No. 340

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 289 A.2d 454 (Kalodner v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kalodner v. Stone, 289 A.2d 454, 447 Pa. 594, 1972 Pa. LEXIS 591 (Pa. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Decree affirmed. Under onr supervisory powers, we direct the Commissioners of Cheltenham Township to present a plan to reapportion the wards of Cheltenham Township to take effect no later than July 1, 1972. Thereafter, the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County is directed to dispose of any and all objections to this plan without undue delay. Costs to be equally divided.

The former Mr. Chief Justice Bell and the former Mr. Justice Barbieri took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Decree affirmed. Under onr supervisory powers, we direct the Commissioners of Cheltenham Township to present a plan to reapportion the wards of Cheltenham Township to take effect no later than July 1, 1972. Thereafter, the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County is directed to dispose of any and all objections to this plan without undue delay. Costs to be equally divided.

The former Mr. Chief Justice Bell and the former Mr. Justice Barbieri took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 A.2d 454, 447 Pa. 594, 1972 Pa. LEXIS 591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kalodner-v-stone-pa-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack