Kalodner v. Stone

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Kalodner v. Stone

289 A.2d 454, 447 Pa. 594, 1972 Pa. LEXIS 591

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 20, 1972·No. Appeals, No. 340·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Decree affirmed. Under onr supervisory powers, we direct the Commissioners of Cheltenham Township to present a plan to reapportion the wards of Cheltenham Township to take effect no later than July 1, 1972. Thereafter, the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County is directed to dispose of any and all objections to this plan without undue delay. Costs to be equally divided.

The former Mr. Chief Justice Bell and the former Mr. Justice Barbieri took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Decree affirmed. Under onr supervisory powers, we direct the Commissioners of Cheltenham Township to present a plan to reapportion the wards of Cheltenham Township to take effect no later than July 1, 1972. Thereafter, the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County is directed to dispose of any and all objections to this plan without undue delay. Costs to be equally divided.

The former Mr. Chief Justice Bell and the former Mr. Justice Barbieri took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Kalodner v. Stone, 289 A.2d 454, 447 Pa. 594, 1972 Pa. LEXIS 591 (Pa. 1972).

Pincite

289 A.2d 454 (Kalodner v. Stone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related