Kalmanson v. Kalmanson
823 So. 2d 304, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11648, 2002 WL 1875753
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 14, 2002·No. No. 5D02-2503·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We deny the petition for writ of certio-rari, because we conclude that the trial court, having granted pro hac vice status to attorney Ducote, is also empowered to revoke the privilege of appearing in this case, should the circumstances warrant such action.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kalmanson v. Kalmanson, 823 So. 2d 304, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11648, 2002 WL 1875753 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
823 So. 2d 304 (Kalmanson v. Kalmanson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson v. Kalmanson
882 So. 2d 1086 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)