Kalmanash v. Smith

265 A.D. 665, 40 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6380

This text of 265 A.D. 665 (Kalmanash v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kalmanash v. Smith, 265 A.D. 665, 40 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6380 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Opinions

In a stockholder’s derivative action (1) order, insofar as appealed from, denying the motion of the named defendants for judgment dismissing the fifth cause of action upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and denying the motion to strike out paragraph 27 of the amended complaint on the ground that the matter therein contained is irrelevant, unnecessary and impertinent and may tend to prejudice, embarrass and delay the fair trial of the action; and (2) order denying the motion of the defendants Baumhogger and Dugan to dismiss the amended complaint as against them on the ground that the alleged causes of action are barred by the Statute of Limitations; and (3) order denying the motion of defendant Morris to dismiss the amended complaint as against him on the ground that the alleged causes of action are barred by the Statute of Limitations, affirmed, with one bill of ten dollars costs and disbursements against appealing defendants. Mo opinion.

Close, P. J., Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents in part, with opinion, in which Adel, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gerdes v. Reynolds
22 N.E.2d 331 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D. 665, 40 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kalmanash-v-smith-nyappdiv-1943.