Kalman v. Kalman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kalman v. Kalman

393 So. 2d 641, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18699

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 11, 1981

DocketNo. 79-1863

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 393 So. 2d 641 (Kalman v. Kalman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kalman v. Kalman, 393 So. 2d 641, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18699 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of dissolution and an award of attorneys fees to the appellee. The appellant has raised numerous issues on appeal. The only error we find as to the dissolution is the provision directing an entity not a party to the proceedings, Alanwood Holding Co., to transfer its interest in a certain mortgage to the appellee. Feldman v. Feldman, 390 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). We also believe it was error for the trial court to award attorneys fees without conducting a hearing thereon with due notice thereof provided to appellant. Feldman v. Feldman, supra.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part and this cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

ANSTEAD, BERANEK* and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of dissolution and an award of attorneys fees to the appellee. The appellant has raised numerous issues on appeal. The only error we find as to the dissolution is the provision directing an entity not a party to the proceedings, Alanwood Holding Co., to transfer its interest in a certain mortgage to the appellee. Feldman v. Feldman, 390 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). We also believe it was error for the trial court to award attorneys fees without conducting a hearing thereon with due notice thereof provided to appellant. Feldman v. Feldman, supra.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part and this cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

ANSTEAD, BERANEK* and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

393 So. 2d 641, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kalman-v-kalman-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack