Kalman Floor Co., Inc. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc.
This text of 486 A.2d 334 (Kalman Floor Co., Inc. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
KALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOS. L. MUSCARELLE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,
v.
WAKEFERN FOOD CORP., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT. KALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION, JOS. L. MUSCARELLE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, GEORGE H. FRIEDMAN AND CAROL MOFFATT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
*267 Merritt T. Viscardi argued the cause for appellant (Apruzzese & McDermott, Mastro & Murphy, attorneys).
Gerald W. Conway argued the cause for respondent Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc. (Conway & Reiseman and Shannon Z. Taylor, attorneys).
Robert M. Schwartz argued the cause for respondents American Arbitration Association, George H. Friedman and Carol Moffatt (Amdur & Friedrich, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 196 N.J. Super. 16 (1984).
For affirmance Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN and GARIBALDI 6.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
486 A.2d 334, 98 N.J. 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kalman-floor-co-inc-v-jos-l-muscarelle-inc-nj-1985.