Kallimanis v. Kallimanis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kallimanis v. Kallimanis

51 A.D.2d 532, 378 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10756

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 29, 1976·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on August 1, 1975, after a nonjury trial, unanimously affirmed, with $60 costs and with disbursements to respondent. There is ample evidence in the record to support the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. A reading of the transcript of the minutes does not bear out appellant’s claim that he was denied a fair trial because of plaintiff’s counsel’s allegedly persistent improper questions or that the court committed any prejudicial error. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Lane and Yesawich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on August 1, 1975, after a nonjury trial, unanimously affirmed, with $60 costs and with disbursements to respondent. There is ample evidence in the record to support the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. A reading of the transcript of the minutes does not bear out appellant’s claim that he was denied a fair trial because of plaintiff’s counsel’s allegedly persistent improper questions or that the court committed any prejudicial error. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Lane and Yesawich, JJ.

Kallimanis v. Kallimanis, 51 A.D.2d 532, 378 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

51 A.D.2d 532 (Kallimanis v. Kallimanis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.