Kallenberg v. Roebling Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kallenberg v. Roebling Construction Co.

126 A.D. 943, 111 N.Y.S. 1126

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 126 A.D. 943 (Kallenberg v. Roebling Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kallenberg v. Roebling Construction Co., 126 A.D. 943, 111 N.Y.S. 1126 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The plaintiff is given no preference by statute or by either the General or Special Rules of Practice, and there was no sufficient ground for preferring this case over other issues. The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Houghton and Scott, JJ.- Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

The plaintiff is given no preference by statute or by either the General or Special Rules of Practice, and there was no sufficient ground for preferring this case over other issues. The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Houghton and Scott, JJ.- Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 A.D. 943, 111 N.Y.S. 1126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kallenberg-v-roebling-construction-co-nyappdiv-1908.