Kalkes v. Storms

Michigan Supreme Court

Kalkes v. Storms

53 N.W. 622, 93 Mich. 480, 1892 Mich. LEXIS 1024

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 18, 1892

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 53 N.W. 622 (Kalkes v. Storms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kalkes v. Storms, 53 N.W. 622, 93 Mich. 480, 1892 Mich. LEXIS 1024 (Mich. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

McGrath, C. J.

This is ejectment, brought to recover possession of premises occupied by defendant and his wife for some years as a homestead. The wife was not joined as a defendant. For this and other reasons, which it is not necessary to discuss, the trial judge directed a verdict for defendant.

The case is ruled by Hodson v. Van Fossen, 26 Mich. 68; Henry v. Gregory, 29 Id. 68; Rowe v. Kellogg, 54 Id. 206; Cleaver v. Bigelow, 61 Id. 47; Haddy v. Tobias, 85 Id. 326, — and the judgment is affirmed.

The ‘other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGrath, C. J.

This is ejectment, brought to recover possession of premises occupied by defendant and his wife for some years as a homestead. The wife was not joined as a defendant. For this and other reasons, which it is not necessary to discuss, the trial judge directed a verdict for defendant.

The case is ruled by Hodson v. Van Fossen, 26 Mich. 68; Henry v. Gregory, 29 Id. 68; Rowe v. Kellogg, 54 Id. 206; Cleaver v. Bigelow, 61 Id. 47; Haddy v. Tobias, 85 Id. 326, — and the judgment is affirmed.

The ‘other Justices concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 N.W. 622, 93 Mich. 480, 1892 Mich. LEXIS 1024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kalkes-v-storms-mich-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack