Kalkes v. Storms

53 N.W. 622, 93 Mich. 480, 1892 Mich. LEXIS 1024
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 18, 1892·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

McGrath, C. J.

This is ejectment, brought to recover possession of premises occupied by defendant and his wife for some years as a homestead. The wife was not joined as a defendant. For this and other reasons, which it is not necessary to discuss, the trial judge directed a verdict for defendant.

The case is ruled by Hodson v. Van Fossen, 26 Mich. 68; Henry v. Gregory, 29 Id. 68; Rowe v. Kellogg, 54 Id. 206; Cleaver v. Bigelow, 61 Id. 47; Haddy v. Tobias, 85 Id. 326, — and the judgment is affirmed.

The ‘other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kalkes v. Storms, 53 N.W. 622, 93 Mich. 480, 1892 Mich. LEXIS 1024 (Mich. 1892).

53 N.W. 622 (Kalkes v. Storms) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haviland v. Chase
74 N.W. 477 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1898)