Kaliszewski v. Dubail

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kaliszewski v. Dubail

471 S.W.3d 402, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1007, 2015 WL 5823956

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 6, 2015·No. ED 102155·Published

Opinion

[403] ORDER

PER CURIAM

Joseph Kaliszewski (“Appellant”) appeals from a judgment of the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations- Commission (“the Commission”) denying him unemployment compensation because he was an independent contractor and not an employee of Newell D. Dubail and his partners (collectively, “the Partnership”). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. -No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[403] ORDER

PER CURIAM

Joseph Kaliszewski (“Appellant”) appeals from a judgment of the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations- Commission (“the Commission”) denying him unemployment compensation because he was an independent contractor and not an employee of Newell D. Dubail and his partners (collectively, “the Partnership”). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. -No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Kaliszewski v. Dubail, 471 S.W.3d 402, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1007, 2015 WL 5823956 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

471 S.W.3d 402 (Kaliszewski v. Dubail) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.