Kalish v. Krieger

322 N.E.2d 273, 35 N.Y.2d 864, 363 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1134
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 1974·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[865]*865Memorandum. In the ease of these as with most jury instructions, additional reflection might suggest reorganization, slightly different emphases, and more precise phrasing. We find here, however, neither errors of substance nor significant confusion between those portions of the instructions relating to contributory negligence and those relating to proximate causation.

Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Babin concur; Judge Stevens taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kalish v. Krieger, 322 N.E.2d 273, 35 N.Y.2d 864, 363 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1134 (N.Y. 1974).

322 N.E.2d 273 (Kalish v. Krieger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Espriel v. New York Downtown Hospital
298 A.D.2d 165 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Brady v. Harborfields Central School District No. 6
60 A.D.2d 591 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)