Kalish v. Hosier
This text of 364 F.2d 829 (Kalish v. Hosier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
364 F.2d 829
Hyman KALISH, Appellant,
v.
Harold A. HOSIER, I. M. Rosenblatt, Wallace J. Axelson, W.
C. King, Jr., Denver Mailers Union Number 8 Local
of the International Mailers Union, and
the International Mailers
Union, Appellees.
No. 8699.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
Aug. 11, 1966.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado; Alfred A. Arraj, Judge.
Milnor H. Senior, Denver, Colo., for appellant.
Philip Hornbein, Jr., Denver, Colo. (Edward J. Fillenwarth, Indianapolis, (Ind., on the brief), for appellees.
Before PHILLIPS, LEWIS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Issues, a decision of which will be dispositive and determinative of this appeal, were considered and decided adversely to Kalish by the trial court below in an exhaustive and well reasoned opinion, Kalish v. Hosier et al., D.C. Colo., 256 F.Supp. 853. Being in full accord therewith, we adopt it as the opinion of this court and affirm the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
364 F.2d 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kalish-v-hosier-ca10-1966.