Kalinich v. Kalinich

205 A.D.2d 736, 614 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6618
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 27, 1994·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

In an action for divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated December 17, 1991, as, after a nonjury trial, granted the plaintiff a divorce on the ground of constructive abandonment.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The trial court’s determination that the plaintiff proved his entitlement to a divorce on the ground of constructive abandonment (see, Domestic Relations Law § 170 [2]; Diemer v Diemer, 8 NY2d 206), was based upon its evaluation of the credibility of the parties. We see no reason to disturb that evaluation on appeal (Caso v Caso, 161 AD2d 683; Raso v Raso, 129 AD2d 692).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review. Mangano, P. J., Altman, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kalinich v. Kalinich, 205 A.D.2d 736, 614 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6618 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

205 A.D.2d 736 (Kalinich v. Kalinich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wasserman v. Wasserman
66 A.D.3d 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Czaban v. Czaban
44 A.D.3d 894 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Hathaway v. Hathaway
16 A.D.3d 458 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Mitry v. Vezza
255 A.D.2d 370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Garver v. Garver
253 A.D.2d 512 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Caravello v. Caravello
215 A.D.2d 428 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)