Kalinger v. Royal Globe Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kalinger v. Royal Globe Insurance

50 A.D.2d 898, 377 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11800

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 29, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 898 (Kalinger v. Royal Globe Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kalinger v. Royal Globe Insurance, 50 A.D.2d 898, 377 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— In consolidated actions inter alia to declare defendant Royal Globe Insurance Companies’ denial of insurance coverage invalid, said defendant and its agent, defendant Lewis Behrend Co., Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 3, 1974, which granted plaintiffs’ separate motions for summary judgment against Royal Globe and ordered entry of judgment declaring that it is required to defend Nicholas Fiore and/or Nick Fiore in the pending negligence actions commenced by plaintiffs herein. Order affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements jointly to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. Royal Globe’s delay of 14 months in denying coverage under the policy was unreasonable. Rabin, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Margett and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In consolidated actions inter alia to declare defendant Royal Globe Insurance Companies’ denial of insurance coverage invalid, said defendant and its agent, defendant Lewis Behrend Co., Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 3, 1974, which granted plaintiffs’ separate motions for summary judgment against Royal Globe and ordered entry of judgment declaring that it is required to defend Nicholas Fiore and/or Nick Fiore in the pending negligence actions commenced by plaintiffs herein. Order affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements jointly to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. Royal Globe’s delay of 14 months in denying coverage under the policy was unreasonable. Rabin, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Margett and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 898, 377 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kalinger-v-royal-globe-insurance-nyappdiv-1975.