Kalina v. State

596 So. 2d 1114, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1906, 1992 WL 41485
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 6, 1992·No. No. 89-00864·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PATTERSON, Judge.

We find no merit in the appellant’s arguments relating to his conviction for armed robbery, and we affirm the judgment. As to the sentence, the state did not prove disputed foreign convictions scored as prior record, and the state concedes error. See English v. State, 529 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Thus, we reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing. The guidelines score must be recalculated to reflect prior convictions that the state can verify. On remand the trial court may impose a departure sentence if there is a valid basis to do so, because at the original sentencing the trial court believed it was imposing a guidelines sentence. See State v. Vanhorn, 561 So.2d 584 (Fla.1990).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kalina v. State, 596 So. 2d 1114, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1906, 1992 WL 41485 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

596 So. 2d 1114 (Kalina v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Montague v. State
656 So. 2d 508 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Woodard Tire Co. v. Hartley Realty Inc.
596 So. 2d 1114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)