Kaleikini v. Yoshioka
This text of Kaleikini v. Yoshioka (Kaleikini v. Yoshioka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-11-0000611 27-SEP-2012 12:28 PM
NO. SCAP-11-0000611
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
PAULETTE KA#ANOHIOKALANI KALEIKINI, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
WAYNE YOSHIOKA, in his official capacity as Director of the City and County of Honolulu’s Department of Transportation Services; CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU; HONOLULU CITY COUNCIL; PETER CARLISLE, in his official capacity as Mayor; CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICES; CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND PERMITTING; WILLIAM J. AILA, JR., in his official capacity as Chairperson of the Board of Land and Natural Resources and state historic preservation officer; PUA#ALAOKALANI AIU, in her official capacity as administrator of the State Historic Preservation Division; BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES; DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES; NEIL ABERCROMBIE, in his official capacity as Governor; and O#AHU ISLAND BURIAL COUNCIL, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.
(CIV. NO. 11-1-0206-01)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, and McKenna, JJ.; Circuit Judge Browning, in place of Acoba, J., recused; and Circuit Judge To#oto#o, in place of Duffy, J., recused)
Upon consideration of the Motion to Reconsider, Modify
and/or Clarify Opinion filed by Respondents/Defendants-Appellees Wayne Yoshioka in his official capacity as Director of the City
and County of Honolulu’s Department of Transportation Services,
City and County of Honolulu, Honolulu City Council, Peter
Carlisle in his official capacity as Mayor, City and County of
Honolulu Department of Transportation Services, and City and
County of Honolulu Department of Planning and Permitting
(collectively “City respondents”) on September 4, 2012; the
Amicus Curiae Brief filed by Faith Action for Community Equity
and Pacific Resource Partnership on September 10, 2012; and
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant’s memoranda in opposition thereto,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 27, 2012.
Robert C. Godbey, Don S. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald Kitaoka, Gary Y. Takeuchi, John P. Manaut and /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Lindsay N. McAneeley for City respondents /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
David Kimo Frankel and /s/ R. Mark Browning Ashley K. Obrey, for petitioner /s/ Fa#auuga To#oto#o
William Meheula and Keani Alapa for Faith Action for Community Equity and Pacific Resource Partnership
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kaleikini v. Yoshioka, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaleikini-v-yoshioka-haw-2012.