Kaleem J. Ra-Hashim v. U. S. Bank Trust, N. A.
This text of Kaleem J. Ra-Hashim v. U. S. Bank Trust, N. A. (Kaleem J. Ra-Hashim v. U. S. Bank Trust, N. A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ March 31, 2015
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A15A1396. KALEEM J. RA-HASHIM et al. v. U. S. BANK TRUST, N.A.
This case originated as a dispossessory action in magistrate court. After an adverse judgment, Defendants Kaleem J. Ra-Hashim and Fonda H. Ra-Hashim sought review before the superior court. The superior court also ruled against the Ra- Hashims, who then filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. “[A]ppeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of lower courts by certiorari or de novo proceedings shall be by application for discretionary appeal.” Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003); see also OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). Because the Ra-Hashims did not follow the proper procedure for requesting appellate review in this case, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 03/31/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kaleem J. Ra-Hashim v. U. S. Bank Trust, N. A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaleem-j-ra-hashim-v-u-s-bank-trust-n-a-gactapp-2015.