Kale v. State
767 So. 2d 1269, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12328, 2000 WL 1396018
This text of 767 So. 2d 1269 (Kale v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kale v. State, 767 So. 2d 1269, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12328, 2000 WL 1396018 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
Opinion
Although the trial judge denied the defendant’s 3.850 motion on the erroneous ground that it was untimely filed, we affirm on the authority of section 39.059(7)(d), Florida Statutes (1995). See Cargle v. State, No. SC92031, slip op. at 7 & n. 2, — So.2d-,-& n. 2, 2000 WL 1353726 (Fla. Sept.21, 2000) (majority opinion); id. at 8-10, at-(Pariente, J., concurring).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cargle v. State
770 So. 2d 1151 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
767 So. 2d 1269, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12328, 2000 WL 1396018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kale-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.