Kalb v. Toledo Restaurant Equipment Co.
This text of 734 So. 2d 1155 (Kalb v. Toledo Restaurant Equipment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the order of November 2, 1998, granting the garnishee’s motion to ■ vacate the final garnishment judgment, see §§ 77.055, .083, Fla. Stat. (1997); BellSouth Adver. & Pub. Corp. v. Security Bank, N.A., 698 So.2d 254 (Fla.1997), aff'g Security Bank N.A. v. BellSouth Adver. & Pub. Corp., 679 So.2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); State of Florida v. Thurmond, 721 So.2d 827 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); T-Jett Enter., Inc. v. Ernest & Stewart, Inc., 543 So.2d 390 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Corporacion Peruana de Aeropuertos y Aviacion Comercial v. Boy, 180 So.2d 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965), except for correcting paragraph two of the order by deleting “Garnishee Toledo,” wherever it appears in paragraph two and substituting in its place, “Defendant Jorge Monje.”
Affirmed as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
734 So. 2d 1155, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7270, 1999 WL 346212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kalb-v-toledo-restaurant-equipment-co-fladistctapp-1999.