Kalas v. Consolidated Telegraph & Electrical Subway Co.
148 N.E. 736, 240 N.Y. 633, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 863
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., CArdozo, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ. Absent: Pound, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kalas v. Consolidated Telegraph & Electrical Subway Co., 148 N.E. 736, 240 N.Y. 633, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 863 (N.Y. 1925).
148 N.E. 736 (Kalas v. Consolidated Telegraph & Electrical Subway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sobel v. City of New York
173 N.E.2d 771 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)
Sobel v. City of New York
9 A.D.2d 271 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Probst v. New York Central Railroad
237 A.D. 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)