Kalas v. Consolidated Telegraph & Electrical Subway Co.
148 N.E. 736, 240 N.Y. 633, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 863
This text of 148 N.E. 736 (Kalas v. Consolidated Telegraph & Electrical Subway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kalas v. Consolidated Telegraph & Electrical Subway Co., 148 N.E. 736, 240 N.Y. 633, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 863 (N.Y. 1925).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., CArdozo, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ. Absent: Pound, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sobel v. City of New York
173 N.E.2d 771 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)
Sobel v. City of New York
9 A.D.2d 271 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Probst v. New York Central Railroad
237 A.D. 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
148 N.E. 736, 240 N.Y. 633, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kalas-v-consolidated-telegraph-electrical-subway-co-ny-1925.