Kalam Ullah v. William Barr

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 7 2020 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

KALAM ULLAH, AKA Mahammed No. 16-73874 Sayedul Hoq, AKA Mohammad Hoq, AKA Mohammed Hoq, Agency No. A075-653-618

Petitioner, ORDER v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and WARDLAW and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

The memorandum disposition filed on February 6, 2020, and appearing at

793 F. App’x 551, is amended as follows:

At pages 552–53, replace

corroborating evidence, and his claims turned on his own testimony, the IJ

properly determined that Petitioner was not entitled to withholding of removal or

protection under the CAT.> with

conclusion that the documentary evidence submitted by Petitioner was insufficient

to establish his claims. Accordingly, the agency properly concluded that Petitioner

was not entitled to withholding of removal or protection under the CAT.> With this amendment, the panel has unanimously voted to deny Petitioner’s

petition for rehearing. The petition for rehearing is DENIED. No further petitions

shall be entertained.