Kakazu v. Christopher
This text of Kakazu v. Christopher (Kakazu v. Christopher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 06-JUN-2022 11:18 AM SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX Dkt. 6 ODAC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I
YUKO KAKAZU, Respondent/Petitioner-Appellee,
vs.
PETER CHRISTOPHER, Petitioner/Respondent-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX & CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CIVIL NO. 3SS17-1-0093)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
Petitioner/Respondent-Appellant Peter Christopher’s
Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on April 28, 2022 is
hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, June 6, 2022.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kakazu v. Christopher, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kakazu-v-christopher-haw-2022.