Kakalios v. Mesevich
This text of 259 A.D. 112 (Kakalios v. Mesevich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The affidavits submitted by defendants raise such substantial questions as to plaintiff’s right to the relief demanded in the complaint as to call for the denial of his motion.
The granting of a mandatory injunction pendente lite is justified only where the situation is unusual and where the granting of such relief is essential to maintain the status quo pending the trial of the action. (Moller v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Co., 174 App. Div. 458.) In this case there was no jurisdiction for granting this extraordinary relief. The plaintiff concededly is now employed at an adequate salary.
The orders appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied.
Present — O’Malley, Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
Orders -unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 112, 18 N.Y.S.2d 189, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kakalios-v-mesevich-nyappdiv-1940.