Kaj Theill and Raymonde M. Theill v. Charles W. Whitlock

Ninth Circuit

Kaj Theill and Raymonde M. Theill v. Charles W. Whitlock

183 F.2d 776

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 22, 1950·No. 12288·Published

Opinion

183 F.2d 776

Kaj THEILL and Raymonde M. Theill, Appellants,
v.
Charles W. WHITLOCK, Appellee.

No. 12288.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

August 22, 1950.

Appeal from the United States District Court, Northern District of California, Southern Division; Michael J. Roche, Judge.

Charles A. Christin, Christin, Keegan & Carroll, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Allison E. Schofield, Raymond L. Hanson, Brunswig Sholars Schofield, Hanson & Sholars, all of San Francisco, Cal. (Walter S. Stevenson, Thomas M. Jenkins, San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellee.

Before STEPHENS, Circuit Judge, and BOWEN and LEMMON, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

183 F.2d 776

Kaj THEILL and Raymonde M. Theill, Appellants,
v.
Charles W. WHITLOCK, Appellee.

No. 12288.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

August 22, 1950.

Appeal from the United States District Court, Northern District of California, Southern Division; Michael J. Roche, Judge.

Charles A. Christin, Christin, Keegan & Carroll, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Allison E. Schofield, Raymond L. Hanson, Brunswig Sholars Schofield, Hanson & Sholars, all of San Francisco, Cal. (Walter S. Stevenson, Thomas M. Jenkins, San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellee.

Before STEPHENS, Circuit Judge, and BOWEN and LEMMON, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

Kaj Theill and Raymonde M. Theill v. Charles W. Whitlock, 183 F.2d 776 (9th Cir. 1950).

Pincite

183 F.2d 776 (Kaj Theill and Raymonde M. Theill v. Charles W. Whitlock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.