Kaj Theill and Raymonde M. Theill v. Charles W. Whitlock
This text of 183 F.2d 776 (Kaj Theill and Raymonde M. Theill v. Charles W. Whitlock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
183 F.2d 776
Kaj THEILL and Raymonde M. Theill, Appellants,
v.
Charles W. WHITLOCK, Appellee.
No. 12288.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
August 22, 1950.
Appeal from the United States District Court, Northern District of California, Southern Division; Michael J. Roche, Judge.
Charles A. Christin, Christin, Keegan & Carroll, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Allison E. Schofield, Raymond L. Hanson, Brunswig Sholars Schofield, Hanson & Sholars, all of San Francisco, Cal. (Walter S. Stevenson, Thomas M. Jenkins, San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellee.
Before STEPHENS, Circuit Judge, and BOWEN and LEMMON, District Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
183 F.2d 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaj-theill-and-raymonde-m-theill-v-charles-w-whitlock-ca9-1950.