Kaitlyn Lucretia Ritcherson v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kaitlyn Lucretia Ritcherson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 9242
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 9, 2014·No. 03-13-00804-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00804-CR

Kaitlyn Lucretia Ritcherson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-DC-11-302663, HONORABLE DAVID CRAIN, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appellant filed her notice of appeal on November 22, 2013, and the clerk’s record

was filed on March 10, 2014. On April 8, we sent court reporter Raquel Kocher notice that the

reporter’s record was overdue, setting a new deadline of April 18, and telling her that if she was

unable to meet the new deadline, she was to provide a written explanation for the delay and an

estimate of when the record would be filed. On May 13, after having received no response, we

called and left a message inquiring about the status of the record. To date, Ms. Kocher has not

replied to our inquiries, nor has the record been filed. Ms. Kocher is therefore ordered to file the

reporter’s record no later than June 27, 2014. Failure to file the record by that date will result in

Ms. Kocher being called before the Court to show cause why she should not be held in contempt for

violating our order. It is ordered June 9, 2014.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaitlyn Lucretia Ritcherson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Kaitlyn Lucretia Ritcherson v. State (Kaitlyn Lucretia Ritcherson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.