Kaiser v. Weise
This text of 85 Pa. 366 (Kaiser v. Weise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered, November 7th Í877,
— This case falls directly within the ruling in the case of Seely v. City of Pittsburgh, 1 Norris 360, that the per foot front rule of assessment is inapplicable to lands such as those along Hazelwood avenue.
The payment by Kaiser of the assessment of $906.93 was volun[369]*369tary, the lien upon the premises, even if rightly assessed, having expired at the time of payment.
On both grounds the court below was right.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 Pa. 366, 1877 Pa. LEXIS 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaiser-v-weise-pa-1877.