Kaiser v. Travelers Insurance

487 F.2d 1300, 1974 A.M.C. 1815
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 11, 1974
DocketNo. 73-2653
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 487 F.2d 1300 (Kaiser v. Travelers Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kaiser v. Travelers Insurance, 487 F.2d 1300, 1974 A.M.C. 1815 (5th Cir. 1974).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The parents of a minor child who was killed as a result of a boating accident appeal this admiralty action on two grounds relating to their claim for damages.

First, they claim recovery for loss of love and affection. This point was settled contrary to plaintiffs’ contention by our recent cases of Canal Barge Company, Inc. v. Griffith, 480 F.2d 11 (5th Cir. 1973) and Hueschen v. Fluor Ocean Services, 487 F.2d 1401 (5th Cir. 1973) which held that there can be no recovery for loss of love and affection in a death action brought under the general maritime law.

Second, they claim that recovery should have been given for pain, suffering, and mental anguish prior to death. No such contention was made in the trial court and it appears from the record that there is insufficient evidence to support this ground of appeal.

This decision which renders plaintiffs liable for costs of this appeal makes it unnecessary for this Court to consider the merits of the cross-appeal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gele v. Chevron Oil Co.
574 F.2d 243 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
Gele v. Chevron Oil Company
574 F.2d 243 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
487 F.2d 1300, 1974 A.M.C. 1815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaiser-v-travelers-insurance-ca5-1974.