Home/Indiana Court of Appeals/Kaiser v. Somers

Kaiser v. Somers

138 N.E. 20, 80 Ind. App. 89, 1923 Ind. App. LEXIS 98
Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided February 2, 1923·No. No. 11,205·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Nichols, C. J.

Action by appellant Ernest Kaiser to enjoin appellee Simon W. Somers from the closing of a lane.

After the commencement of the action, Amanda Kaiser, wife of appellant Ernest, and Mary E. Somers, wife of appellee Simon W. were on motion made parties defendant.

Numerous errors are assigned by appellants, but, as we view this case, we need only to consider error of the court in overruling appellant Ernest Kaiser’s motion for a new trial.

The following plat will be useful in helping to understand the situation.

[91]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaiser v. Somers, 138 N.E. 20, 80 Ind. App. 89, 1923 Ind. App. LEXIS 98 (Ind. Ct. App. 1923).

138 N.E. 20 (Kaiser v. Somers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dalton v. Real Estate & Improvement Co.
92 A.2d 585 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Searcy v. La Grotte
372 N.E.2d 755 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1978)
Potter v. Potter
112 S.E.2d 569 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)
Grobe v. Ottmers
224 S.W.2d 487 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1949)
Krueger v. Beecham
61 N.E.2d 65 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1945)