Kaiser v. Somers

138 N.E. 20, 80 Ind. App. 89, 1923 Ind. App. LEXIS 98
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 2, 1923
DocketNo. 11,205
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 138 N.E. 20 (Kaiser v. Somers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kaiser v. Somers, 138 N.E. 20, 80 Ind. App. 89, 1923 Ind. App. LEXIS 98 (Ind. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Nichols, C. J.

Action by appellant Ernest Kaiser to enjoin appellee Simon W. Somers from the closing of a lane.

After the commencement of the action, Amanda Kaiser, wife of appellant Ernest, and Mary E. Somers, wife of appellee Simon W. were on motion made parties defendant.

Numerous errors are assigned by appellants, but, as we view this case, we need only to consider error of the court in overruling appellant Ernest Kaiser’s motion for a new trial.

The following plat will be useful in helping to understand the situation.

[91]*91

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dalton v. Real Estate & Improvement Co.
92 A.2d 585 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Searcy v. La Grotte
372 N.E.2d 755 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1978)
Potter v. Potter
112 S.E.2d 569 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)
Grobe v. Ottmers
224 S.W.2d 487 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1949)
Krueger v. Beecham
61 N.E.2d 65 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 N.E. 20, 80 Ind. App. 89, 1923 Ind. App. LEXIS 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaiser-v-somers-indctapp-1923.