Kaiser v. Mathis
737 So. 2d 586, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8486, 1999 WL 420404
This text of 737 So. 2d 586 (Kaiser v. Mathis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kaiser v. Mathis, 737 So. 2d 586, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8486, 1999 WL 420404 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
Opinion
Because the Department of Corrections has offered transcription of the audio tapes in question in lieu of turning physical custody of the tapes over to appellant, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. [587]*587See Kensu v. Haigh, 87 F.3d 172, 175 (6th Cir.1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Temujin Kensu v. Allen C. Haigh Tom Bell Yvonne Murzen Sandy Grant Linda Hayes
87 F.3d 172 (Sixth Circuit, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
737 So. 2d 586, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8486, 1999 WL 420404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaiser-v-mathis-fladistctapp-1999.