Kaiser v. Kaiser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kaiser v. Kaiser

252 A.D. 624, 300 N.Y.S. 641, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5745

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 17, 1937

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 252 A.D. 624 (Kaiser v. Kaiser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaiser v. Kaiser, 252 A.D. 624, 300 N.Y.S. 641, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The interlocutory judgment directing defendants to file a verified accounting of the interest of Emanuel W. Kaiser in the partnership of Louis Kaiser & Co. as of January 4, 1930, the date of his death, we believe to be proper. However, due weight should be given to the report of the certified public accountants, Leslie Banks & Co., which was completed as at the close of business of October 31, 1929. That audit, which contains a balance sheet of the firm’s assets and liabilities and a schedule of each partner’s interest in the capital of the firm and in his individual accounts, was certified by the decedent as correct “ in every particular ” by letter dated November 18, 1929.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs'.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The interlocutory judgment directing defendants to file a verified accounting of the interest of Emanuel W. Kaiser in the partnership of Louis Kaiser & Co. as of January 4, 1930, the date of his death, we believe to be proper. However, due weight should be given to the report of the certified public accountants, Leslie Banks & Co., which was completed as at the close of business of October 31, 1929. That audit, which contains a balance sheet of the firm’s assets and liabilities and a schedule of each partner’s interest in the capital of the firm and in his individual accounts, was certified by the decedent as correct “ in every particular ” by letter dated November 18, 1929.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs'.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D. 624, 300 N.Y.S. 641, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaiser-v-kaiser-nyappdiv-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack