Kaiser v. Flaccus
22 A. 88, 138 Pa. 332, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1283
Opinion
The first assignment of error was practically abandoned npon the argument, and we fail to find error in the answer of the learned judge to the defendant’s tenth point. It is true, the affirmance was qualified, but we think the qualification justified by the circumstances of the case. It does not need discussion.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kaiser v. Flaccus, 22 A. 88, 138 Pa. 332, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1283 (Pa. 1890).
22 A. 88 (Kaiser v. Flaccus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weinschenk v. Philadelphia Home Made Bread Co.
101 A. 926 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Whitley v. Evans
30 Pa. Super. 41 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Wallace v. Henderson
60 A. 574 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
O'Rourke v. Alphons Custodis Chimney Construction Co.
21 Pa. Super. 52 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)