Kaiser v. Board of Regents of University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kaiser v. Board of Regents of University

46 A.D.2d 981, 362 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3263

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 46 A.D.2d 981 (Kaiser v. Board of Regents of University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaiser v. Board of Regents of University, 46 A.D.2d 981, 362 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3263 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding initiated in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 6510 of the Education Law, to review determinations of the Commissioner of Education suspending both the individual petitioner’s license to practice pharmacy and the corporate petitioner’s certificate to conduct a pharmacy in this State for a period of three months. The record establishes that the petitioners clearly failed to keep any appropriate record as required in regard to their receipt of certain narcotic drugs. There is substantial evidence to support all of the other violations found by the respondent and the penalties imposed are not excessive. Determinations confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Cooke, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding initiated in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 6510 of the Education Law, to review determinations of the Commissioner of Education suspending both the individual petitioner’s license to practice pharmacy and the corporate petitioner’s certificate to conduct a pharmacy in this State for a period of three months. The record establishes that the petitioners clearly failed to keep any appropriate record as required in regard to their receipt of certain narcotic drugs. There is substantial evidence to support all of the other violations found by the respondent and the penalties imposed are not excessive. Determinations confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Cooke, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.2d 981, 362 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaiser-v-board-of-regents-of-university-nyappdiv-1974.