Kaiser Trading Co. v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp.
This text of 443 F.2d 1364 (Kaiser Trading Co. v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The “Opinion and Order”, (containing findings) of the district court, 321 F.Supp. 923 (1970) is thorough, persuasive and finds ample support in the evidence as reflected on the present record. We [1365]*1365cannot hold the district court clearly erroneous as a matter of law. Kelly v. Kosuga, 358 U.S. 516, 79 S.Ct. 429, 3 L.Ed.2d 475 (1958). We likewise find no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge in issuing the preliminary mandatory injunction.
The appeal is dismissed.
We urge the district court, and the parties hereto, to arrange for a trial of this matter, on the merits, at the earliest possible date.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
443 F.2d 1364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaiser-trading-co-v-associated-metals-minerals-corp-ca9-1971.