Kaiser Industries Corp. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
524 F.2d 1154
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kaiser Industries Corp. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 515 F.2d 964 →
Opinion
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
It is ordered that the opinion filed April 4, 1975, 3 Cir., 515 F.2d 964, be amended by adding the following sentence to footnote 9:
The statements regarding the basic oxygen process and the contribution of the patentees to the art are based primarily upon Judge Freeman’s opinion in McLouth, (Henry J. Kaiser Co. v. McLouth Steel Corp., D.C., 257 F.Supp. 372) at 378-80.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kaiser Industries Corp. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 524 F.2d 1154 (3d Cir. 1975).
524 F.2d 1154 (Kaiser Industries Corp. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry J. Kaiser Company v. McLouth Steel Corp.
257 F. Supp. 372 (E.D. Michigan, 1966)