Kaiser & Brother v. Savannah Shoe Factory
Opinion
1. When it is affirmatively shown by direct and positive evidence that mortgages attacked as fraudulent are bona fide because given to secure debts actually due by the mortgagor, and there is no evidence to the contrary, they should be treated as valid subsisting liens upon the property which they cover.
2. The present case, upon its undisputed facts, is controlled by the decision of this court in Atlanta B. & I. Co. v. Bluthenthal, 101 Ga. 541, and the cases there cited.
3. The court erred in granting an injunction and appointing a receiver.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
30 S.E. 665 (Kaiser & Brother v. Savannah Shoe Factory) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.