Kaiser & Brother v. Savannah Shoe Factory

30 S.E. 665, 105 Ga. 470, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 555
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 25, 1898·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

1. When it is affirmatively shown by direct and positive evidence that mortgages attacked as fraudulent are bona fide because given to secure debts actually due by the mortgagor, and there is no evidence to the contrary, they should be treated as valid subsisting liens upon the property which they cover.

2. The present case, upon its undisputed facts, is controlled by the decision of this court in Atlanta B. & I. Co. v. Bluthenthal, 101 Ga. 541, and the cases there cited.

3. The court erred in granting an injunction and appointing a receiver.

Judgment reversed.

All concurring, except Cobb, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaiser & Brother v. Savannah Shoe Factory, 30 S.E. 665, 105 Ga. 470, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 555 (Ga. 1898).

30 S.E. 665 (Kaiser & Brother v. Savannah Shoe Factory) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Savannah Shoe Factory v. Kaiser & Brother
33 S.E. 404 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)