Kaiser & Brother v. Savannah Shoe Factory

30 S.E. 665, 105 Ga. 470, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 555
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 25, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 S.E. 665 (Kaiser & Brother v. Savannah Shoe Factory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kaiser & Brother v. Savannah Shoe Factory, 30 S.E. 665, 105 Ga. 470, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 555 (Ga. 1898).

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

1. When it is affirmatively shown by direct and positive evidence that mortgages attacked as fraudulent are bona fide because given to secure debts actually due by the mortgagor, and there is no evidence to the contrary, they should be treated as valid subsisting liens upon the property which they cover.

2. The present case, upon its undisputed facts, is controlled by the decision of this court in Atlanta B. & I. Co. v. Bluthenthal, 101 Ga. 541, and the cases there cited.

3. The court erred in granting an injunction and appointing a receiver.

Judgment reversed.

All concurring, except Cobb, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Savannah Shoe Factory v. Kaiser & Brother
33 S.E. 404 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 S.E. 665, 105 Ga. 470, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaiser-brother-v-savannah-shoe-factory-ga-1898.