Kainz v. Arrowhead Senior Living Community

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Kainz v. Arrowhead Senior Living Community

843 N.W.2d 785, 2014 WL 976876, 2014 Minn. LEXIS 101

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMarch 10, 2014

DocketNo. A13-0733

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 843 N.W.2d 785 (Kainz v. Arrowhead Senior Living Community) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kainz v. Arrowhead Senior Living Community, 843 N.W.2d 785, 2014 WL 976876, 2014 Minn. LEXIS 101 (Mich. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals was filed on April 26, 2013, and on December 26, 2013, we issued a decision in Dykhoff v. Xcel Energy, 840 N.W.2d 821 (Minn.2013), that addressed whether the work-connection test is an appropriate test for determining whether an injury is com-pensable.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) filed April 1, 2013, be, and the same is, vacated and the matter is remanded to the WCCA for further proceedings consistent with Dykhoff v. Xcel Energy, 840 N.W.2d 821 (Minn.2013).

LILLEHAUG, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

BY THE COURT

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI