Kain v. Ames

44 A.2d 212, 133 N.J.L. 341, 1945 N.J. LEXIS 232

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 27, 1945·Published

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The. Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, JJ. 10.

For affirmance (not on opinion below) — Case, J. 1.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cubiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The. Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, JJ. 10.

For affirmance (not on opinion below) — Case, J. 1.

For reversal — None.

Kain v. Ames, 44 A.2d 212, 133 N.J.L. 341, 1945 N.J. LEXIS 232 (N.J. 1945).

Pincite

44 A.2d 212 (Kain v. Ames) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.